Which sites do the Top Diggers Read?
How do you influence the influencers?
I’ve become slightly obsessed with figuring out Digg. I’m fairly confident that the top Diggers represent the key to understanding Digg, so I scraped the most recent 150 submitted stories from the top 100 Diggers (just under 15,000 stories) with the goal of finding out what they read.
A few observations:
- Although the list largely consisted of several tech-centric sites, there were a few surprises on the list – several domains that I’d never heard of before
- Many Top Diggers have a pretty narrow reading list. However, there are those that are pretty adventurous – I’ll put together a separate post about the those diggers
- Several sites have benefited tremendously from “Patron Diggers” – one or two diggers that religiously reads and submits from the site (in some cases they may be site owners, employees, etc.) See this post on nwfdailynews.com and GiantAppleCore.
The first output from my research is the top 50 domains that Top Diggers are reading. I’ve highlighted the domains where a single Digger accounted for an inordinate share of Diggs.
| # | Domain | Total Submits from Top 100 Diggers | #Unique Diggers | Patron Digger (#Submits) |
| 1 | youtube.com | 514 | 73 | Foenetik(105) |
| 2 | news.com.com | 358 | 57 | |
| 3 | news.yahoo.com | 298 | 56 | |
| 4 | nytimes.com | 249 | 49 | Parislemon (72) |
| 5 | news.bbc.co.uk | 210 | 53 | iFelix (71) |
| 6 | today.reuters.com | 179 | 44 | |
| 7 | thinkprogress.org | 175 | 11 | jlegum (119) |
| 8 | physorg.com | 166 | 28 | |
| 9 | livescience.com | 157 | 16 | starexplorer (104) |
| 10 | arstechnica.com | 154 | 35 | |
| 11 | nwfdailynews.com | 147 | 1 | giantAppleCore(147) |
| 12 | washingtonpost.com | 142 | 35 | |
| 13 | engadget.com | 119 | 41 | |
| 14 | breitbart.com | 117 | 10 | elebrio (87) |
| 15 | abcnews.go.com | 114 | 33 | |
| 16 | cnn.com | 105 | 33 | |
| 17 | wired.com | 102 | 40 | |
| 18 | video.google.com | 92 | 37 | |
| 19 | gearlive.com | 91 | 2 | andru (90) |
| 20 | theinquirer.net | 91 | 26 | |
| 21 | businessweek.com | 89 | 29 | |
| 22 | gizmodo.com | 86 | 26 | |
| 23 | msnbc.msn.com | 85 | 45 | |
| 24 | forbes.com | 79 | 34 | |
| 25 | linuxdevices.com | 79 | 7 | deviceguru (50) |
| 26 | howtoforge.com | 76 | 5 | hausmasta (72) |
| 27 | eweek.com | 71 | 23 | |
| 28 | money.cnn.com | 68 | 27 | |
| 29 | eurekalert.org | 66 | 11 | |
| 30 | lewrockwell.com | 66 | 2 | Rhiannon1214 (50) |
| 31 | betanews.com | 65 | 10 | |
| 32 | informationweek.com | 63 | 20 | |
| 33 | kotaku.com | 61 | 18 | |
| 34 | space.com | 60 | 10 | |
| 35 | usatoday.com | 56 | 31 | |
| 36 | joystiq.com | 55 | 18 | |
| 37 | theregister.co.uk | 54 | 21 | |
| 38 | sciencedaily.com | 53 | 12 | |
| 39 | sports.espn.go.com | 53 | 14 | |
| 40 | timesonline.co.uk | 53 | 31 | |
| 41 | latimes.com | 52 | 21 | |
| 42 | tgdaily.com | 51 | 11 | Bleek-II (30) |
| 43 | newscientist.com | 50 | 19 | |
| 44 | news.zdnet.com | 48 | 16 | |
| 45 | mediamatters.org | 47 | 6 | snipehack (38) |
| 46 | time.com | 47 | 25 | |
| 47 | blogs.zdnet.com | 46 | 20 | |
| 48 | dailytech.com | 45 | 16 | Bleek-II (20) |
| 49 | guardian.co.uk | 45 | 27 | |
| 50 | sfgate.com | 45 | 22 | Tomboy501 (16) |
nwfdailynews.com is the Northwest Florida News. Go figure.
Update
I’ve uploaded the source data I used for the analysis. Use that file to answer questions and comments along the lines of “You forgot ‘insert favorite site here’. I see that site on Digg all the time”. You’ll feel better knowing that I didn’t forget it – this was a study of the top diggers, not a study of all the sites submitted to Digg.
9 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Uhmmm… nice stats, but please don’t forget to include /. ;-)
I was shocked – slashdot was only #621 on the list with only 3 submits by the top Diggers. It almost seems like the Top Diggers are intentionally not submitting Slashdot. Once traffic dies down, I’ll post a copy of the full file (I’m not sure what it would do to my server to post it now).
I find it extremely hard to believe that slashdot is not on the list.
I find that most people on Digg and Reddit look at slashdot as the old guard that is very closed off to submitting so most people do not like to submit stories from slashdot
the same way you dont see any /. articles in Digg.com, digg doesnt comes up in /. because neither is a news or article generetor, only ping pointer to the link with the news
Makes sense. In that case let me be a bit anal and say that the title is wrong then. “Which sites do the Top Diggers Read” would most likely include slashdot in the top 50. Now, “Which sites do the Top Diggers _submit_ to Dig” would be more accurate.
loconet, you’re right – I made the assumption that submitting was equivalent to reading, but have since learned that Diggers often submit the source of the news, not the place where they learned about it.
[…] The 50 sites that Top Diggers submit the most […]
[…] Which Sites do the Top Diggers Read. I looked at the 50 sites most frequently submitted by the top Diggers. […]