Which sites do the Top Diggers Read?

Analysis,Digg by on December 9, 2006 at 12:30 am

How do you influence the influencers?

I’ve become slightly obsessed with figuring out Digg. I’m fairly confident that the top Diggers represent the key to understanding Digg, so I scraped the most recent 150 submitted stories from the top 100 Diggers (just under 15,000 stories) with the goal of finding out what they read.

A few observations:

  • Although the list largely consisted of several tech-centric sites, there were a few surprises on the list – several domains that I’d never heard of before
  • Many Top Diggers have a pretty narrow reading list. However, there are those that are pretty adventurous – I’ll put together a separate post about the those diggers
  • Several sites have benefited tremendously from “Patron Diggers” – one or two diggers that religiously reads and submits from the site (in some cases they may be site owners, employees, etc.) See this post on nwfdailynews.com and GiantAppleCore.

The first output from my research is the top 50 domains that Top Diggers are reading. I’ve highlighted the domains where a single Digger accounted for an inordinate share of Diggs.

#DomainTotal Submits from Top 100 Diggers#Unique DiggersPatron Digger (#Submits)
1youtube.com51473Foenetik(105)
2news.com.com35857
3news.yahoo.com29856
4nytimes.com24949Parislemon (72)
5news.bbc.co.uk21053iFelix (71)
6today.reuters.com17944
7thinkprogress.org17511jlegum (119)
8physorg.com16628
9livescience.com15716starexplorer (104)
10arstechnica.com15435
     
11nwfdailynews.com1471giantAppleCore(147)
12washingtonpost.com14235
13engadget.com11941
14breitbart.com11710elebrio (87)
15abcnews.go.com11433
16cnn.com10533
17wired.com10240
18video.google.com9237
19gearlive.com912andru (90)
20theinquirer.net9126
     
21businessweek.com8929
22gizmodo.com8626
23msnbc.msn.com8545
24forbes.com7934
25linuxdevices.com797deviceguru (50)
26howtoforge.com765hausmasta (72)
27eweek.com7123
28money.cnn.com6827
29eurekalert.org6611
30lewrockwell.com662Rhiannon1214 (50)
     
31betanews.com6510
32informationweek.com6320
33kotaku.com6118
34space.com6010
35usatoday.com5631
36joystiq.com5518
37theregister.co.uk5421
38sciencedaily.com5312
39sports.espn.go.com5314
40timesonline.co.uk5331
     
41latimes.com5221
42tgdaily.com5111Bleek-II (30)
43newscientist.com5019
44news.zdnet.com4816
45mediamatters.org476snipehack (38)
46time.com4725
47blogs.zdnet.com4620
48dailytech.com4516Bleek-II (20)
49guardian.co.uk4527
50sfgate.com4522Tomboy501 (16)

nwfdailynews.com is the Northwest Florida News. Go figure.

Update

I’ve uploaded the source data I used for the analysis. Use that file to answer questions and comments along the lines of “You forgot ‘insert favorite site here’. I see that site on Digg all the time”. You’ll feel better knowing that I didn’t forget it – this was a study of the top diggers, not a study of all the sites submitted to Digg.

9 Comments

  1. csman — December 9, 2006 @ 12:38 pm

    Uhmmm… nice stats, but please don’t forget to include /. ;-)

  2. davenaff — December 9, 2006 @ 12:43 pm

    I was shocked – slashdot was only #621 on the list with only 3 submits by the top Diggers. It almost seems like the Top Diggers are intentionally not submitting Slashdot. Once traffic dies down, I’ll post a copy of the full file (I’m not sure what it would do to my server to post it now).

  3. loconet — December 9, 2006 @ 1:13 pm

    I find it extremely hard to believe that slashdot is not on the list.

  4. billnad — December 9, 2006 @ 1:30 pm

    I find that most people on Digg and Reddit look at slashdot as the old guard that is very closed off to submitting so most people do not like to submit stories from slashdot

  5. carlosdreyfus — December 9, 2006 @ 1:36 pm

    the same way you dont see any /. articles in Digg.com, digg doesnt comes up in /. because neither is a news or article generetor, only ping pointer to the link with the news

  6. loconet — December 10, 2006 @ 11:44 am

    Makes sense. In that case let me be a bit anal and say that the title is wrong then. “Which sites do the Top Diggers Read” would most likely include slashdot in the top 50. Now, “Which sites do the Top Diggers _submit_ to Dig” would be more accurate.

  7. davenaff — December 10, 2006 @ 4:55 pm

    loconet, you’re right – I made the assumption that submitting was equivalent to reading, but have since learned that Diggers often submit the source of the news, not the place where they learned about it.

  8. […] The 50 sites that Top Diggers submit the most […]

  9. […] Which Sites do the Top Diggers Read. I looked at the 50 sites most frequently submitted by the top Diggers. […]

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License. | Dave Naffziger's BlogDave & Iva Naffziger